Opinion


In the latest Brand Z Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands Google, with IBM and Apple were listed as the top three brands–and out of the top 10, there are just three non-tech brands: McDonald’s, Coca-Cola, and Marlboro. What will the future hold for non-tech brands?

Some interesting quotes from the Brand Z Report:

“… consumers became well-informed brand advocates and critics, fortified with knowledge about price, product, and supply gained from searching the Internet and sharing information on Facebook and other social networking sites. This democracy of commerce superseded the sovereignty of companies. Brand leadership required sharing some power in order to retain any power.”

“Brands’ success today requires Trust plus Recommendation. This conclusion emerged from BrandZ research across thousands of brands. It resulted in a new metric, the TrustR score, for helping brands realize their full power.”

Great clip from Trendwatching.com showing people from around the world and their opinions on brands.

Shawn Graham also has an interesting article in Fast Company that focuses on customer service and those companies that provide exceptional follow through. Everything from sending handwritten follow-up notes to just taking the time to listen to customers are the practical and simple things that will help generate brand loyalists – those consumers who will steadfastly advocate and defend your brand online and beyond.

In his current Harvard Business Review article, Andrew O’Connell discusses the findings of a recent Journal of Advertising Research study that claims households with DVR’s “showed no decrease in recall or in prompted recognition of commercials among DVR users” who had used the fast forward function. This was especially true for ads that had previously been seen at least once at regular speed.

The article goes on to recommend that advertisers should consider airing their spots on live programming (such as news or sports) to ensure viewers will first have a chance to see the ad at regular speed. After that, viewers who hit the FF on their DVR remotes will have their eyes glued to the screen for the first sign that their program has returned and hence see the speeded up ads along the way. Currently many cable stations are airing spots that only display bold text as a VO drones on and on, but at 3 or 4 x speed it’s a quick, silent read. (And yes, just as boring and lame as ever, but they seem to be getting some results.)

Since the JAR study estimated that 68% of DVR owners skip past commercials, it’s a sure thing that DVR makers, such as TiVo, may soon provide options to skip past entire blocks of commercials in an instant – thus creating more headaches for advertisers.

In recent years behavioral marketing has joined product placement marketing in TV programming. Will this tactic follow into movies and other forms of electronic entertainment as well? It remains to be seen, but the answer is more than likely yes depending on whether there is a good fit between the marketer’s product and the film’s plot or video games theme. The bottom line is with so many new ways to reach audiences (and with much of the audience being fragmented) marketers will have to continue to find new and inviting ways to sway consumer behavior that is favorable to their product or service.

A recent Wall Street Journal article focused on NBC Universal’s programming that includes behavioral placement – which “is designed to sway viewers to adopt actions they see modeled in their favorite shows. And it helps marketers who want to associate their brands with a feel-good, socially aware show.” So viewers of 30 Rock and The Office will see familiar characters being good stewards of the environment by recycling and doing things in a matter of fact way that tends to resonate with viewers. The article goes on to state that “the more seamlessly integrated the behavior is, the less it feels like the show is trying to manipulate.”

In some ways behavioral marketing may appear as new a fad. When marketers try to do something that they hope will be the next “hip and/or cool” trend the audience will often become cynical about the effort unless it seems genuinely real and original. The WSJ article continued by stating that NBC incorporates messages “that tend to be fairly innocuous… [and] the trick is not to turn off viewers by being lectury or too obvious…”

One could also compare behavior marketing to sponsorship marketing – being that it connects its product to a sport. Red Bull is a master of attaching its product to extreme sports and is always present in the background when the athletes are snowboarding, skate boarding or surfing or whatever. The Red Bull logo is always present and strategically placed in every frame. It’s a familiar set of tactics that has been around for decades, but Red Bull does it exceptionally well. Does this blatant logo placement turn off the fans of these sports?  No, because the target audience understands and appreciates the connection and are aware that the sponsors pay the athletes and event organizers huge sums of money. (A position several aspiring wannabe athletes/couch fans would love to be in.)

So what about behavioral marketing? Can it be used in a similar fashion? Could for instance someone as famous as Shaun White be persuaded by a group of  marketers to be seen casually recycling (or just acting in a manner that is environmentally conscious) on the street, at his house or when on the slopes? It may be also wise to have the rest of Mr. White’s competitors also casually follow this behavior (but never over the top). As noted in the WSJ article, marketers and advertisers will then gravitate towards an attitude and a behavior that falls in line with their products and will therefore be more inclined to be associated with these activities.

The idea is to incorporate behaviors in such a way that it just seems natural and barely noticeable. Wearing seat belts, turning off lights when leaving a room or automatically inserting ear buds when heading out for a run are behaviors that many people do– so why not market it as a behavior? If we see a character on a popular TV show board a plane and automatically put on their noise-canceling headphones will the audience see that as the norm? And will we make the connection when during the commercial break, low and behold, there is a spot for Bose headphones?

Are marketers are being too manipulative? Possibly, but the fact is we are so saturated with blatant messages, that it seems inevitable that behavior marketing will be expanded into every facet of our online, TV and film viewing and consumer experience.

In a recent article in Fast Company it stated that Facebook now has 411 million users, which is 6% of the people in the world.

The article, which lists the countries whose citizens are signing up fastest, states that “Facebook, stuffed with personal data on each member, is becoming the world’s phone book. The implications for social change are potentially huge.” You think? It’s way more than a phone book. It has become the social depository for peoples lives and for all of us to comment on and share – and for employers and others to review and judge.

As a person who has interviewed many candidates for my department, I am one of many (if not most) employers who will view their Facebook and Linkedin pages. If Facebook were merely basic information it wouldn’t be such an issue. However, as we all know, it’s far more than that. The amount of “personal” information people are willing to share is amazing.

I find it kind of amusing that so many people are upset with the government for “tapping our phones” while at the same time these same folks are uploading and displaying an enormous amount of personal information about themselves and their families and friends. An article that came out last year in The Independent stated that “online social networking can seriously damage your life”.

I guess I am one of the few people who has a FB account but has yet to post anything. What are you willing to post on FB and do you ever consider the implications and who may have future access?

A recent Wall Street Journal article featured a San Francisco restaurant that gave people free meals for life when they agreed to get a tattoo of the restaurant logo. Now that’s brand loyalty!

Updated: June 15, 2010

As a marketer and advertiser who understands the importance of consumer packaging across the marketing mix (4 P’s – product, price, place, promotion) I am also concerned about how retail industries should be using more biodegradable and recycled packaging.  I recognize that it comes down to the simple economics of cost and practicality as much as function, convenience and of course brand image, but much like the movement to rid styrofoam of CFC’s back in the late 80’s, there needs to be a new movement to ensure all, or most, packaging becomes recyclable, biodegradable and/or re-used.

While walking the local grocery isle I am often perplexed by the variety of packaging that seems to be well above and beyond what is needed to contain and promote the product. Excess plastic and non-functional design make some of these products difficult to purchase since the company hasn’t thought about its packaging strategy beyond cost. Yes, I am being general (there are probably many examples of eco-friendly packaging that are also functional) but there aren’t enough products with eco-friendly packaging available.

The folks at Frito-Lay are promoting their new eco-friendly and biodegradable Sun Chips bags which is a start, but why aren’t they extending this practice to all their packaging? (And, as a pet peeve, these new bags make a lot of noise.)

(more…)

Update: 06/14/10

USA Today weighs in “At CNN, perhaps a little, um, creativity is in order.”

Here is a great example of why CNN is losing viewers at such a rapid rate. Comparing YouTube videos of Justin Bieber and a prairie dog? Really? This has to be some of the lamest content on a news channel ever – which in my opinion is precisely why CNN has dropped off the ratings chart. Just awful.

——–

There have been a few recent articles in the NY Times and The Independent that discussed the recent “precipitous decline in ratings” for CNN and its prime time programs. On the other hand FOX News has been increasing viewers at an exponential rate. The folks at Newsy also have a short video on the subject.

My question is where are all the CNN viewers going? Certainly not all of these viewers are switching to FOX? My personal view of CNN is that it has become a shell of its former illustrious self as THE cable news outlet.

(more…)

« Previous Page